Indonesia is currently in the throes of an environmental emergency. Thousands of hectares of forest are burning across the vast country, causing toxic smoke to be released into the atmosphere. This has led to eerie apocalyptic scenes of deep red skies, deserted streets and people forced to cover their faces with masks.

The fires have sent huge amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. The last massive outbreak, in 2015, saw fires that on some days emitted more greenhouse gases than the entire US. They’re also a disaster for orangutans and other wildlife in the country’s forests.

But what about the impact on affected humans? Who is at risk – and how?

Unicef, the UN agency focused on children, said in late September that 10 million children who lived in areas near the fires in Sumatra and Kalimantan were at risk from toxic haze.

A villager extinguishes a fire on burned peatland and forest in Sampit in central Kalimantan on October 2, 2019. Photo: Andrew Gal/ NurPhoto / AFP

Wildfires and haze are not uncommon in Indonesia. Small-scale farmers have traditionally used small and well-controlled fires to clear land for the planting of new crops, but now the fires are getting bigger and more frequently burning out of control.

This is partly because the amount of land devoted to commercial production has steadily increased. Carbon-rich peatland forests on the islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan have been extensively cleared to create new plantations, often to produce palm oil. Weak land tenure security has also led to conflicts between local communities and plantation companies, where burning land has become a weapon to exercise pressure. All this has been exacerbated by the El Niño weather phenomenon, which in some years has caused extraordinarily dry conditions.

What’s at stake?

So far, more than 35,000 fires have been detected in 2019 in the country and air pollution levels are classified as “hazardous” according to the Air Quality Index (AQI).

This year’s fires have been the worst since 2015, when more than 2.5 million hectares of land burned, causing a US$16 billion loss – a substantially larger sum than even the reconstruction costs of the 2004 Boxing Day tsunami. But exposure to the wildfires and the toxic smoke they generate also causes short and long-term damage to human lives.

A helicopter releases water to extinguish forest fires in Kalimantan, Indonesia, in September 2019. Photo: Fully Handoko / EPA

The smoke generated by burning wood and vegetation contains lots of very fine particles, too small for the human eye to see. These particles can easily lodge deep into the lungs and can pass into other organs or the bloodstream.

To see what mass exposure to this sort of pollution may mean in the longer term, we can look at the effects of massive wildfires in late 1997, which burned more than 5 million hectares of land and sent a huge pollution cloud across Southeast Asia. Before 2015, these were Indonesia’s biggest fires on record.

Various researchers have analyzed data from population surveys taken during and after the fires, and found that the smoke generated by the fires harmed adult health and child survival rates at the time, and led to lower health and educational achievements in the longer-term.

For instance, one study found that exposure to toxic smoke resulted in a significant worsening of physical functioning. These effects were especially prolonged among women aged 30-55 years and older adults.

Other research has found that smoke-contaminated air, soil and food is particularly bad for pre and postnatal health. Toxic substances inhaled by the mother interferes with her health, which in turn disrupts fetal nutrition and oxygen flow.

One study found that exposure to the Indonesian wildfires of late 1997 led to more than 15,600 child, infant and fetal deaths, or a 1.2 percentage point decrease in the survival of the exposed children. Poorer people were worst affected.

A family rides through thick haze in Kalimantan, 2015. Photo: Aulia Erlangga/CIFORCC BY-NC-SA

Finally, child nutrition and health can be directly impaired through inhaling toxicants or ingesting them in contaminated raw food, and as a result of the temporary lack of adequate care given by unhealthy adult family members.

My own research, published earlier in 2019, is relevant here. I looked at young children aged 12-36 months living in the affected islands of Sumatra and Kalimantan during the 1997 fires, and I compared them with a comparable group of children who lived in areas not affected by the fires.

I found that exposure to the fires resulted in a significantly slower growth rate of about 1mm per month within the three-month period between first exposure to the fires in September 1997 and the final measurement that December. Doesn’t sound like much? Well, bear in mind that children that age are growing around 1cm a month, so those that I studied were losing a tenth of their growth rate.

The 1997 haze lasted for just a few months. But a few months is a long time when you are a toddler, and for the slightly elder children I studied, the fires happened during a critical period where brain development is more sensitive to nutritional shocks. This then had important repercussions when these children reached school age: on average they delayed enrolment in primary school by six months and eventually achieved almost one year less education compared to the group not affected by fires.

Analysts have said this year’s fires are of a similar scale to the disasters seen in 1997 and 2015. But these studies all imply that exposure to the wildfires entails a real risk for human well-being.

Previous generations of Indonesian children paid the price – if we are to ensure today’s children don’t suffer similar problems, then action needs to be taken to protect the most vulnerable.

 

This report is run under a Creative Commons agreement; the original version was run on The Conversation and can be accessed here